Some opponents[who?] believe that the author of a creative work has certain natural rights to that work, and that it is an integral part of their identity.
The wrong alleged is not simply the causing of financial loss, but may include:[citation needed]
The loss of a chance to make a gain.
The loss of a choice as to how their work is dealt with.
The loss of the capacity to make a decision as to how to run their business, even if that decision is a poor one.
Opponents further argue that copyright creates an incentive for the creation of works. As such, it is important that it be respected, so that creative people are encouraged to create works which benefit society. By infringing copyright, the infringer reduces this incentive, and thus harms society.[citation needed] Opponents argue that the selling of rights to a publishing intermediary is immaterial. Additionally, they argue that financial losses may not occur immediately, but market value is still reduced by infringement. Proponents' counterargument is that market value should be what is willingly paid and not that which is inflated by copyright.[citation needed]
Other artists believe that copyright infringement of their works cheats them out of the monetary incentive to publish their work. The musician, director, or game designer must copyright his or her creative product in order to maintain the exclusive right to profit from his or her product.
tigerbenz
The wrong alleged is not simply the causing of financial loss, but may include:[citation needed]
The loss of a chance to make a gain.
The loss of a choice as to how their work is dealt with.
The loss of the capacity to make a decision as to how to run their business, even if that decision is a poor one.
Opponents further argue that copyright creates an incentive for the creation of works. As such, it is important that it be respected, so that creative people are encouraged to create works which benefit society. By infringing copyright, the infringer reduces this incentive, and thus harms society.[citation needed] Opponents argue that the selling of rights to a publishing intermediary is immaterial. Additionally, they argue that financial losses may not occur immediately, but market value is still reduced by infringement. Proponents' counterargument is that market value should be what is willingly paid and not that which is inflated by copyright.[citation needed]
Other artists believe that copyright infringement of their works cheats them out of the monetary incentive to publish their work. The musician, director, or game designer must copyright his or her creative product in order to maintain the exclusive right to profit from his or her product.
tigerbenz
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น